FFC - LENT
[ SERAPHIM HOME ] .. [ FFC ] . [ YOUTH ] . [ LENT ]
LENT is
Old English for SPRING
by James Akin
From catholic.com
F e a t u r e A r t i c l e
Lent Is Old English for Spring
And Other Fascinating Facts
By James Akin
What is Lent?
According to the General Norms for the Liturgical Year and the Calendar,
"Lent is a preparation for the celebration of Easter. For the Lenten
liturgy disposes both catechumens and the faithful to celebrate the paschal
mystery: catechumens, through the several stages of Christian initiation; the
faithful through reminders of their own baptism and through penitential
practices" (General Norms 27).
Is Lent actually forty days long?
Technically, no. According to the General Norms,
"Lent runs from Ash Wednesday until the Mass of the Lord's Supper,
exclusive" (General Norms 28). This means Lent ends at the
beginning of the Mass of the Lord's Supper on Holy Thursday. Count it as you
will, that's more than forty days. Therefore, the number forty in traditional
hymns such as "Lord, Who Throughout These Forty
Days" is only an approximation.
Are Sundays excluded from Lent?
No. The definition of what days are included in Lent is given above, in General
Norms 28. No exception is made for Sundays. Indeed, the General Norms
go on to specifically name the Sundays of the period as belonging to the
season: "The Sundays of this season are called the First, Second, Third,
Fourth, and Fifth Sundays of Lent. The Sixth Sunday, which
marks the beginning of Holy Week, is called Passion Sunday (Palm Sunday)"
(General Norms 30).
Some people customarily allow themselves on Sunday to have things they have
voluntarily given up for Lent, but since these forms of self-denial were
voluntarily assumed anyway, a person is not under an obligation to practice
them on Sunday (or any other specific day of the week).
Why is the season called Lent?
Lent is the Old English word for spring. In almost all other languages,
Lent's name is a derivative of the Latin term quadragesima or "the forty days."
Why is Lent approximately forty days long?
In the Bible, forty days is a traditional number of discipline, devotion, and
preparation. Moses stayed on the mountain of God forty days (Ex. 24:18, 34:28).
The spies were in the land forty days (Num. 13:25). Elijah traveled
forty days before he reached the cave where he had his vision (1 Kgs. 19:8). Nineveh was given forty days to repent (Jonah
3:4). And, most significantly for our Lenten observance, Jesus spent forty days
in wilderness praying and fasting prior to undertaking his ministry (Matt.
4:2). Thus it is fitting for Christians to imitate him with a forty-day period
of prayer and fasting to prepare to celebrate the climax of Christ's ministry,
Good Friday (the day of the crucifixion) and Easter Sunday (the day of the
Resurrection).
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, "'For we have not a
high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in
every respect has been tested as we are, yet without sinning' [Heb. 4:15]. By
the solemn forty days of Lent the Church unites herself each year to the
mystery of Jesus in the desert" (CCC 540).
What are fast and abstinence?
Under current canon law in the Western rite of the Church, a day of fast is one
on which Catholics who are eighteen to sixty years old are required to keep a
limited fast. In this country you may eat a single, normal meal and have two
snacks so long as these snacks do not add up to a second meal. Children are not
required to fast, but their parents must ensure they are properly educated in
the spiritual practice of fasting. A day of abstinence is a day on which
Catholics fourteen years and older are required to abstain from eating meat.
(Though under the current discipline of the Western rite of the Church, fish,
eggs, milk products, and foods made using animal fat are permitted, they are
not in the Eastern rites.) Their pastor can easily dispense those with medical
conditions from the requirements of fast and/or abstinence.
Is there a biblical basis for abstaining from meat as a sign of repentance?
Yes. The book of Daniel states, "In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia
. . . 'I, Daniel, mourned for three weeks. I ate no choice food; no meat or
wine touched my lips; and I used no lotions at all until the three weeks were
over'" (Dan. 10:1-3).
Isn't abstaining from meat one of the "doctrines of demons" Paul warned about in 1 Timothy 4:1-5?
When Paul warned of those who "forbid people to marry and order them to
abstain from certain foods," he had in mind people with the Manichean
belief that sex is wrong and certain foods like meat are immoral. (Thus the
spiritual ideal for many modern New Agers is a celibate vegetarian, as in the
Eastern religions.)
We know that Paul has in mind those who teach sex and certain foods are
intrinsically immoral because he tells us that these are "foods that God
created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the
truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it
is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and
prayer" (1 Tim. 4:3b-5).
Sex and all kinds of food are good things-which is why
the Catholic Church has marriage for a sacrament and heartily recommends the
practice eating to its members. This is why it is fitting for these things to
be given up as part of a spiritual discipline. Thus Daniel gave up meat (as
well as wine, another symbol of rejoicing), and Paul endorses the practice of
temporary celibacy to engage in a special spiritual discipline of increased
prayer (1 Cor. 7:5). By denying ourselves these good things we encourage an
attitude of humility, free ourselves from dependence on them, cultivate the
spiritual discipline of sacrifice, and remind ourselves of the importance of
spiritual goods over earthly goods.
In fact, if there was an important enough purpose, Paul recommended permanently
giving up marriage and meat. Thus he himself was celibate (1 Cor. 7:8). He
recommended the same for ministers (2 Tim. 2:3-4) and for the unmarried in
order to devote themselves more fully to the Lord (1 Cor. 7:32-34), unless
doing so would subject them to great temptations (1 Cor. 7:9). Similarly, he
recommended giving up meat permanently if it would prevent others from sinning
(1 Cor. 8:13).
Since the Catholic Church requires abstinence from meat only on a temporary
basis, it clearly does not regard meat is immoral. Instead, it regards it as
the giving up of a good thing in order to attain a spiritual goal.
What authority does the Church have to establish days of fast and abstinence?
The authority of Jesus Christ. Jesus told the leaders
of his Church, "Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and
whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven" (Matt.16:19, 18:18).
The language of binding and loosing was (in part) a rabinnic
way of referring to the ability to establish binding halakah or rules of conduct for the faith
community. (See the Jewish Encyclopedia:
"Binding and loosing (Hebrew, asar ve-hittir) . . . Rabinnical
term for 'forbidding and permitting.'")It is especially appropriate that
the references to binding and loosing occur in Matthew, the "Jewish
Gospel."
The Jewish Encyclopedia continues: "The
power of binding and loosing was always claimed by the Pharisees. Under Queen
Alexandra, the Pharisees, says Josephus (Wars of the Jews 1:5:2),
'became the administrators of all public affairs so as to be empowered to
banish and readmit whom they pleased, as well as to loose and to bind.' . . .
The various schools had the power 'to bind and to loose'; that is, to forbid
and to permit (Talmud: Chagigah 3b); and they could
also bind any day by declaring it a fast day (Talmud: Ta'anit
12a). . . . This power and authority, vested in the rabbinical body of each age
of the Sanhedrin, received its ratification and final sanction from the
celestial court of justice (Sifra, Emor, 9; Talmud: Makkot 23b).
"In this sense Jesus, when appointing his disciples to be his successors,
used the familiar formula (Matt. 16:19, 8:18). By these words he virtually
invested them with the same authority as that which he found belonging to the
scribes and Pharisees who 'bind heavy burdens and lay them on men's shoulders,
but will not move them with one of their fingers'; that is 'loose them,' as
they have the power to do (Matt. 23:2-4). In the same sense, [in] the second
epistle of Clement to James II (Clementine Homilies, Introduction [A.D.
221]) Peter is represented as having appointed Clement as his successor,
saying: 'I communicate to him the power of binding and loosing so that, with
respect to everything which he shall ordain in the earth, it shall be decreed
in the heavens; for he shall bind what ought to be bound and loose what ought
to be loosed as knowing the rule of the Church'" (Jewish Encyclopedia 3:215).
Thus Jesus invested the leaders of this Church with the power of making halakah for the Christian
community. This includes the setting of fast days (like Ash Wednesday).
To approach the issue from another angle, every family has the authority to
establish particular family devotions for its members. If the parents decide
that the family will engage in a particular devotion at a particular time (say,
Bible reading after supper), it is a sin for the children to disobey and skip
the devotion for no good reason. In the same way, the Church as the family of
God has the authority to establish its own family devotion, and it is a sin for
the members of the Church to disobey and skip the devotions for no good reason.
Of course, if the person has a good reason the Church dispenses him.
In addition to Ash Wednesday, are any other days during Lent days of fast or abstinence?
Yes. All Fridays during Lent are days of abstinence. Also, Good Friday, the day
on which Christ was crucified, is day of both fast and abstinence.
All days in Lent are appropriate for fasting or abstaining, but canon law does
not require it. Such fasting or abstinence is voluntary.
Why are Fridays during Lent days of abstinence?
Because Jesus died for our sins on Friday, making it an especially appropriate
day of mourning our sins by denying ourselves something we enjoy. (By the same
token, Sunday-the day on which he rose for our salvation-is an especially
appropriate day to rejoice.) During the rest of the year Catholics in this
country are permitted to use a different act of penance on Friday in place of
abstinence, though all Fridays are days of penance on which we are required to
do something expressing sorrow for our sins.
Are acts of repentance appropriate on other days during Lent?
Yes. The Code of Canon Law states, "All Fridays through the year and the
time of Lent are penitential days and time throughout the universal
Church" (CIC 1250).
Why are acts of repentance appropriate at this time of year?
Because it is the time leading up to the commemoration of our
Lord's death for our sins and the commemoration of his resurrection for our
salvation. It is thus especially appropriate to mourn the sins for which
he died. Humans have an innate psychological need to mourn tragedies, and our
sins are tragedies of the greatest sort.
What are appropriate activities for ordinary days during Lent?
Giving up something we enjoy, engaging in physical or spiritual acts of mercy
for others, prayer, fasting, abstinence, going to confession, and other acts
expressing repentance in general.
Is the custom of giving up something for Lent mandatory?
No. However, it is a salutary custom, and parents or guardians may choose to
require it, since the spiritual training of their children is their prime
responsibility.
Why is giving up something for Lent such a salutary custom?
By denying ourselves something we enjoy, we discipline our wills so that we are
not slaves to our pleasures. Just as over-indulging in the pleasure of eating
leads to physical flabbiness, over-indulging in pleasure in general leads to
spiritual flabbiness. When the demands of morality require us to sacrifice
something pleasurable (such as sex outside marriage) or endure hardship (such
as being scorned for the faith), spiritual flabbiness may well make us fail.
Is the denying of pleasure an end in itself?
No, it is only a means to an end. By training ourselves to resist temptations
when they are not sinful we train ourselves to reject temptations when they are
sinful. We also express our sorrow over having failed to resist sinful
temptations in the past. There are few better ways to keep our priorities straight
than by denying ourselves things of lesser priority to show us that they are
not necessary and focus our attention on what is necessary.
Can we deny ourselves too many pleasures?
Definitely. God made human life contingent on certain
goods, such as food, and to refuse to enjoy enough of them has harmful
consequences. For example, if we do not eat enough food we can damage our
bodies (and, in the extreme, even die). Just as there is a balance between
eating too much food and not eating enough food, there is a balance involved in
other goods.
If we deny ourselves too much, it may deprive us of goods God gave us in order
that we might praise him or decrease our effectiveness in ministering to
others. It can also constitute the sin of ingratitude by refusing to enjoy the
things God wanted us to have because he loves us. If a child refused every gift
his parent gave him, it would displease the parent; if we refuse gifts God has
given us, it displeases God because he loves us and wants us to have them.
Aside from Ash Wednesday, what are the principal events of Lent?
There are a variety of saints' days that fall during Lent, and some of these
change from year to year, since the dates of Lent itself change based on when
Easter falls. However, the Sundays during the Lenten season commemorate special
events in the life of our Lord, such as his Transfiguration and his triumphal
entrance into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, which begins Holy Week. Holy Week
climaxes with Holy Thursday, on which Christ celebrated the first Mass; Good
Friday, on which he was crucified; and Holy Saturday-the last day of
Lent-during which our Lord lay in the tomb before his Resurrection on Easter
Sunday.
James Akin is senior apologist at Catholic Answers and a contributing editor of This Rock. His most recent book, The Salvation Controversy, will be published later this year.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2001/0104fea1.asp
[ LENT ]